MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412012897 · doi:10.1080/13854046.2025.2520957

The Minnesota Conference proposed guidelines for education and training in clinical neuropsychology

2025· review· en· W4412012897 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anthony Y. Stringer, Kathleen Fuchs, Veronica Bordes Edgar, Tom Bristow, Stephen Correia, Suzanne Penna, Anny Reyes, Douglas M. Whiteside, Cady Block, Douglas Bodin, Sakina M. Butt, Matthew Calamia, Nyaz Didehbani, Peter Dodzik, Vonetta M. Dotson, Mary A. Fernandes, Krista Freece, Richard Fuller, Glen E. Getz, Lana Harder, Farzin Irani, Laura Janzen, Brick Johnstone, Erin T. Kaseda, Megan Kramer, Cynthia S. Kubu, Jose M. Lafosse, Jennifer Lee-DaRocha, Beatriz MacDonald, Adriana M. Strutt, Michelle R. Madore, W.E. McBride, Luis D. Medina, Grace Mucci, Kritika Nayar, June Yu Paltzer, Courtney Ray, Rebecca E. Ready, Taylor Rose Schmitt, Beth Rush, Shifali Singh, Scott A. Sperling, Lisa D. Stanford, William Stiers, Nikki H. Stricker, Allen E. Thornton, Ryan Van Patten, Susan Vandermorris, Kris Verroulx, Jaime Wilson, Ingram Wright, Andrea L. Zartman, Robert M. Bilder, Daryl Fujii, Amy Heffelfinger, Thomas D. Parsons, Antonio E. Puente, Celiane Rey‐Casserly, Brad L. Roper, Maureen Schmitter‐Edgecombe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Clinical Neuropsychologist · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalSimon Fraser UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropsychologyClinical neuropsychologyTraining (meteorology)PsychologyMedical educationMedicinePsychiatryGeographyCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The Houston Conference Guidelines (Hannay et al., 1998) provided an initial framework for North American neuropsychology training that served the specialty well for several decades. Subsequent advances in technology, increased diversity of the U.S. and Canadian populations, and the adoption of competency-based training models within Health Service Psychology have created a need to update neuropsychology training guidelines. Therefore, in 2022, the Minnesota Conference to Update Education and Training Guidelines in Clinical Neuropsychology began a two-year drafting process leading to the currently proposed update. METHOD: A Steering Committee worked with content experts, consultants, and delegates representing North American neuropsychological organizations and specialists. The final version of the guidelines was developed after reviewing neuropsychological training literature, gathering feedback from specialists, and making iterative revisions of earlier drafts to reach consensus. CONCLUSION: The resulting "Minnesota Guidelines" include five foundational (Neuroscience and Brain Behavior Relationships; Integration of Science and Practice; Ethics, Standards, Laws, and Policies; Diversity; and Professional Relationships) and eight functional (Assessment; Intervention; Interdisciplinary Systems and Consultation; Research and Scholarship; Technology and Innovation; Teaching, Supervision, and Mentoring; Health and Professional Advocacy; and Administration, Management, and Business) areas of competency required for entry level specialty practice. While consensus was not achieved, a majority of voting delegates recommended the Guidelines for adoption and the Guidelines have been endorsed by six neuropsychology education and board certification organizations. The American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology has not endorsed the Minnesota Guidelines and will not make an endorsement decision until three months after online publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.102
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.139
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1020.139
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0090.008
Research integrity0.0140.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.517
GPT teacher head0.609
Teacher spread0.092 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Clinical NeuropsychologistSame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207