MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412012920 · doi:10.32781/cakrawala.v19i1.759

Optimalisasi Analisis Harga Komoditas Daging dan Telur Ayam di Jawa Timur dengan Pendekatan Regresi Semiparametrik

2025· article· id· W4412012920 on OpenAlexaff
Nur Chamidah, Ardi Kurniawan, Rimuljo Hendradi, Fatmawati Fatmawati, Alfinda Novi Kristanti, Naufal Ramadhan Al Akhwal Siregar, Neta Dwi Wulandari, Aisyah Aminy, Muhammad Hendra Herdianto

Bibliographic record

VenueCAKRAWALA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock Farming and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood sciencePhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluktuasi harga yang terlalu tinggi pada komoditas pangan strategis seperti telur dan daging ayam telah menjadi permasalahan krusial, diantaranya disebabkan oleh harga pakan dan tingkat konsumsi masyarakat. Hal ini berdampak pada turunnya daya beli dan kesulitan akses pangan terutama bagi rumah tangga berpendapatan rendah yang mengandalkan kedua komoditas ini sebagai sumber protein utama. Oleh sebab itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh harga jagung sebagai bahan baku pakan ternak dan jumlah penduduk sebagai gambaran tingkat konsumsi masyarakat terhadap harga telur ayam dan harga daging ayam pada 38 Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Timur tahun 2023 dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui aplikasi SISKAPERBAPO dan Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur. Metode yang digunakan adalah regresi semiparametrik birespon linear lokal. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa model prediksi memiliki tingkat akurasi sangat tinggi, dengan nilai MAPE sebesar 1,103% untuk harga telur ayam dan 4,474% untuk harga daging ayam. Penelitian ini penting karena dapat menjadi dasar pengambilan kebijakan dalam upaya stabilisasi harga oleh pemerintah daerah maupun pelaku industri perunggasan di Jawa Timur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCAKRAWALASame topicLivestock Farming and ManagementFrench-language works237,207