MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412014564 · doi:10.18280/isi.300525

Using Open-Source Software to Support Network Management Transformation in Indonesia's Digital Telecommunications Industry

2025· article· en· W4412014564 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bayu Adhi Prakosa, Ab Manan Mansor, Faiz Aizat

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunicationsOpen source softwareDigital transformationTelecommunications Management NetworkTransformation (genetics)BusinessSoftwareOpen sourceComputer scienceElement management systemWorld Wide WebComputer securityNetwork management stationNetwork architectureOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the transformative role of open-source software (OSS) in enhancing network management within Indonesia's telecommunications sector.Using a mixedmethods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews, the research identifies key drivers of OSS adoption, including technological readiness, organizational support, and regulatory frameworks.The findings highlight how OSS adoption can overcome operational challenges and improve network management efficiency, providing actionable insights for industry leaders and policymakers.The study presents a novel framework for OSS integration, which is particularly relevant in the context of Indonesia's digital transformation.Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed the robustness of the findings, with strong model fit indices (CFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.06).This research contributes to the understanding of OSS adoption in emerging markets, offering practical recommendations to increase OSS integration within Indonesia's telecommunication sector and enhance the industry's overall digital transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d information→Same topicICT Impact and Policies→French-language works237,207→