MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412019798 · doi:10.2196/72874

Privacy-Preserving Glycemic Management in Type 1 Diabetes: Development and Validation of a Multiobjective Federated Reinforcement Learning Framework

2025· article· en· W4412019798 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fatemeh Sarani Rad, Juan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Diabetes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycemicReinforcement learningHypoglycemiaComputer scienceDiabetes managementReinforcementDiabetes treatmentArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Effective diabetes management requires precise glycemic control to prevent both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, yet existing machine learning (ML) and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches often fail to balance competing objectives. Traditional RL-based glucose regulation systems primarily focus on single-objective optimization, overlooking factors such as minimizing insulin overuse, reducing glycemic variability, and ensuring patient safety. Furthermore, these approaches typically rely on centralized data processing, which raises privacy concerns due to the sensitive nature of health care data. There is a critical need for a decentralized, privacy-preserving framework that can personalize blood glucose regulation while addressing the multiobjective nature of diabetes management. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate PRIMO-FRL (Privacy-Preserving Reinforcement Learning for Individualized Multi-Objective Glycemic Management Using Federated Reinforcement Learning), a novel framework that optimizes clinical objectives-maximizing time in range (TIR), reducing hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and minimizing glycemic risk-while preserving patient privacy. Methods: We developed PRIMO-FRL, integrating multiobjective reward shaping to dynamically balance glucose stability, insulin efficiency, and risk reduction. The model was trained and tested using simulated data from 30 simulated patients (10 children, 10 adolescents, and 10 adults) generated with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved UVA/Padova simulator. A comparative analysis was conducted against state-of-the-art RL and ML models, evaluating performance using metrics such as TIR, hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL), and glycemic risk scores. Results: The PRIMO-FRL model achieved a robust overall TIR of 76.54%, with adults demonstrating the highest TIR at 81.48%, followed by children at 77.78% and adolescents at 70.37%. Importantly, the approach eliminated hypoglycemia, with 0.0% spent below 70 mg/dL across all cohorts, significantly outperforming existing methods. Mild hyperglycemia (180-250 mg/dL) was observed in adolescents (29.63%), children (22.22%), and adults (18.52%), with adults exhibiting the best control. Furthermore, the PRIMO-FRL approach consistently reduced glycemic risk scores, demonstrating improved safety and long-term stability in glucose regulation.. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of PRIMO-FRL as a transformative, privacy-preserving approach to personalized glycemic management. By integrating federated RL, this framework eliminates hypoglycemia, improves TIR, and preserves data privacy by decentralizing model training. Unlike traditional centralized approaches that require sharing sensitive health data, PRIMO-FRL leverages federated learning to keep patient data local, significantly reducing privacy risks while enabling adaptive and personalized glucose control. This multiobjective optimization strategy offers a scalable, secure, and clinically viable solution for real-world diabetes care. The ability to train personalized models across diverse populations without exposing raw data makes PRIMO-FRL well-suited for deployment in privacy-sensitive health care environments. These results pave the way for future clinical adoption, demonstrating the potential of privacy-preserving artificial intelligence in optimizing glycemic regulation while maintaining security, adaptability, and personalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR DiabetesSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207