MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412019910 · doi:10.2196/72640

Resident Physician Recognition of Tachypnea in Clinical Simulation Videos in Japan: Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4412019910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kiyoshi Shikino, Yuji Nishizaki, Sho Fukui, Koshi Kataoka, Daiki Yokokawa, Taro Shimizu, Yu Yamamoto, Kazuya Nagasaki, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Yasuharu Tokuda

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintTachypneaCross-sectional studyMedicinePsychologyComputer scienceAnesthesiaWorld Wide WebPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Traditional assessments of clinical competence using multiple-choice questions (MCQs) have limitations in the evaluation of real-world diagnostic abilities. As such, recognizing non-verbal cues, like tachypnea, is crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective patient care. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how detecting such cues impacts the clinical competence of resident physicians by using a clinical simulation video integrated into the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE). Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled first- and second-year resident physicians who participated in the GM-ITE 2022. Participants watched a 5-minute clinical simulation video depicting a patient with acute pulmonary thromboembolism, and subsequently answered diagnostic questions. Propensity score matching was applied to create balanced groups of resident physicians who detected tachypnea (ie, the detection group) and those who did not (ie, the non-detection group). After matching, we compared the GM-ITE scores and the proportion of correct clinical simulation video answers between the two groups. Subgroup analyses assessed the consistency between results. Results: In total, 5105 resident physicians were included, from which 959 pairs were identified after the clinical simulation video. Covariates were well balanced between the detection and non-detection groups (standardized mean difference <0.1 for all variables). Post-matching, the detection group achieved significantly higher GM-ITE scores (mean [SD], 47.6 [8.4]) than the non-detection group (mean [SD], 45.7 [8.1]; mean difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6; P=.041). The proportion of correct clinical simulation video answers was also significantly higher in the detection group (39.2% vs 3.0%; mean difference, 36.2%; 95% CI, 32.8-39.4). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent results across sex, postgraduate years, and age groups. Conclusions: Overall, this study revealed that detecting non-verbal cues like tachypnea significantly affects clinical competence, as evidenced by higher GM-ITE scores among resident physicians. Integrating video-based simulations into traditional MCQ examinations enhances the assessment of diagnostic skills by providing a more comprehensive evaluation of clinical abilities. Thus, recognizing non-verbal cues is crucial for clinical competence. Video-based simulations offer a valuable addition to traditional knowledge assessments by improving the diagnostic skills and preparedness of clinicians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical EducationSame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207