DOLPHIN advances single-cell transcriptomics beyond gene level by leveraging exon and junction reads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advent of single-cell sequencing has revolutionized the study of cellular dynamics, providing unprecedented resolution into the molecular states and heterogeneity of individual cells. However, the rich potential of exon-level information and junction reads within single cells remains underutilized. Conventional gene-count methods overlook critical exon and junction data, limiting the quality of cell representation and downstream analyses such as subpopulation identification and alternative splicing detection. We introduce DOLPHIN, a deep learning method that integrates exon-level and junction read data, representing genes as graph structures. These graphs are processed by a variational graph autoencoder to improve cell embeddings. DOLPHIN not only demonstrates superior performance in cell clustering, biomarker discovery, and alternative splicing detection but also provides a distinct capability to detect subtle transcriptomic differences at the exon level that are often masked in gene-level analyses. By examining cellular dynamics with enhanced resolution, DOLPHIN provides new insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis is conventionally limited to gene-level quantification, missing transcript diversity. Here, authors present DOLPHIN, a deep learning method that enables exon- and junction-level analysis to improve cell representation and detect alternative splicing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".