MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412030541 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3585615

Green Video Transcoding in Cloud Environments Using Kubernetes: A Framework With Dynamic Renewable Energy Allocation and Priority Scheduling

2025· article· en· W4412030541 on OpenAlexaff
B.M Beena, Prashanth C. Ranga, Akhileswar Chowdary, Rohan Gamidi, M Hemasri, Tejaswi Muppala

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingTranscodingScheduling (production processes)Renewable energyDynamic priority schedulingReal-time computingDistributed computingComputer networkOperating systemQuality of serviceMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video content continues to be a major source of Internet traffic, with a growing demand for high-quality, on-demand videos. This leads to significant energy consumption across cloud servers. Conserving energy and improving energy efficiency in cloud servers is a major challenge. The growing demand for video transcoding services and increasing concerns over energy consumption necessitate systems that balance processing power with energy usage. The research addresses these challenges by developing a green, energy-aware video transcoding system that predicts energy availability from renewable sources (solar and wind) using machine learning techniques and optimizes tasks allocation. The system utilizes a Kubernetes-managed backend to dynamically scale resources for FFmpeg-based transcoding while prioritizing renewable energy, minimizing grid usage utilizing the advanced machine learning models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost, predict energy production and guide task assignments. The integration of predictive analytics with Kubernetes’ Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) allows dynamic workload distribution, ensuring optimal energy utilization. Additionally, the system incorporates real-time energy monitoring to adjust task scheduling based on fluctuations in renewable energy availability. Two novel scheduling algorithms, Dynamic Renewable Energy Allocation (DREA) and Energy-Aware Priority Scheduling (EAPS), enhance energy efficiency. DREA allocates tasks to energy zones based on real-time renewable availability, while EAPS prioritizes tasks by urgency and energy needs, deferring low-priority tasks to periods of high renewable availability. These green strategies minimize reliance on non-renewable sources while maintaining performance and scalability. The system’s modular design allows easy integration with various cloud platforms, increasing its applicability in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, extensive scalability tests demonstrate that the proposed approach maintains efficient task execution even under high workloads, making it suitable for large-scale cloud environments. By reducing energy consumption and carbon footprint, this framework contributes to the advancement of sustainable cloud computing solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207