Body-Related Emotions, Physical Activity, and Flourishing Among Males and Females: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study tested direct and indirect associations between body-related self-conscious emotions (authentic pride, hubristic pride, shame, guilt), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and flourishing. Sex was tested as a moderator. Participants (N = 523; Mage = 35.9 years, 55.4% male) completed self-report surveys. Moderated mediation models were performed separately for each emotion. There were significant direct effects of each emotion and MVPA with flourishing, and the effects for authentic and hubristic pride were significant only for males. The indirect associations were also significant, such that lower guilt and higher authentic and hubristic pride along with higher MVPA were related to higher flourishing for males and females. The indirect effect of shame, MVPA, and flourishing was only significant for females. The findings suggest sex differences in the importance of body-related emotions, MVPA, and flourishing that may require unique theoretical and practical considerations to understand how body image may thwart or promote flourishing for males and females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".