MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412031752 · doi:10.1093/qjmam/hbaf006

A Neutral Nonlinear Elastic Circular Inhomogeneity Obeying Neuber’s Stress–Strain Law in Anti-Plane Shear

2025· article· en· W4412031752 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Wang, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNonlinear systemPlane stressShear (geology)Shear stressStress–strain curvePlane (geometry)Stress (linguistics)MechanicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsMaterials scienceGeometryComposite materialPhilosophyThermodynamicsFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary We consider a three-phase composite in which the internal circular inhomogeneity obeying Neuber’s nonlinear stress-strain law is bonded to an infinite linear isotropic elastic matrix via a middle linear isotropic elastic annular coating when the matrix is subjected to uniform remote anti-plane stresses. A neutral circular inhomogeneity that does not disturb the prescribed uniform stress field in the matrix is identified by numerically solving the resulting two coupled nonlinear equations via iteration or equivalently by solving a single sextic equation to arrive at the constant effective strain within the inhomogeneity and the ratio of the shear modulus of the matrix to that of the coating. The upper bound of the shear modulus ratio is the classical Hashin–Shtrikman formula while the lower bound is the classical Hashin–Shtrikman formula for a cavity. A neutral coated nonlinear spherical inhomogeneity in conductivity obeying Neuber’s law is also designed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied MathematicsSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207