MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412032886 · doi:10.36602/jsba.2020.10.94

New occurrence of Ostracodes used as indications of paleoecology and age for Scots Bay Formation, Bay of Fundy, Canada

2025· article· en· W4412032886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hassan S. Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venueمجلة العلوم الاساسية و التطبيقية · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayPaleoecologyScotsOceanographyGeologyScots pineGeographyPaleontologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fossils in the Jurassic Scots Bay Formation are rare but silicified, speciesinclude ostracodes, small gastropods, small clams, fragments of charophyte stems, andfreshwater stromatolites. The silicified ostracodes and algae are found in thin to thickbeds of mixed carbonate and siliciclastic units deposited in erosional paleotopographiclows on the top of the Early Jurassic North Mountain Basalt (NMB).Ostracodes are the most common type of fossil in the Scots Bay Formation, in thisstudy nearly 800 specimens have been extracted. These ostracodes are moderately towell preserved, thin-shelled, and occur as whole silicified carapaces, separated valves,and internal molds. Three ostracodes genera have been identified: Darwinula, Timiriasevia, and Metacypris. Determining the exact age for this Formation has been a matter of mild dispute. Therecorded new occurrence of these ostracodes assemblage will help to revise age andprovide enough knowledge about paleoecology of Scots Bay Formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمجلة العلوم الاساسية و التطبيقيةSame topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207