MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412036929 · doi:10.46793/arheon7.099k

PUTUJUĆA SKUPŠTINA MAĐARSKOG GEOGRAFSKOG DRUŠTVA U VELIKOM BEČKEREKU 1909. GODINE

2024· article· en· W4412036929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArheon. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStonefly species taxonomy and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1907, the Hungarian Geographical Society, founded in 1872, has been holding the so-called “wandering” General Assemblies annually in different cities of Hungary, with the ultimate goal of becoming more familiar with and thoroughly exploring the surroundings of the country. At the suggestion of the Toronto Hungarian Cultural Society, 1908 saw Groß-Betschkerek (today Zrenjanin) chosen as the venue for the next year’s event. The wandering assembly took place in early autumn 1909 and lasted three days (September 25–27). Comprehensive preparations and organizational measures were taken for this conference, involving entire bodies of county and city officials. Distinguished people from the city and county were mobilized to ensure a more effective and better reception for the esteemed guests. The three-day program included: a ceremonial reception of the society members at the train station, their accommodation, and an evening social event at the local casino; on the following day, the General Assembly took place, with various presentations from the members, followed by a lunch in honor of the guests, a tour of the city’s sights, an evening lecture about Mexico at the municipal theater, and a soirée at the Torontál district chief Béla Botka’s residence. On the last day, an excursion was organized to the Danube wetlands near Opovo to acquaint Hungary’s most renowned geographical scholars with the local conditions. Although it has remained unexplored in the framework of local historiography to this day, the wandering General Assembly of the Hungarian Geographical Society held in Groß-Betschkerek in 1909 is considered one of the most significant cultural events in the city during the first decade of the 20th century. The conference brought together the leading geographers, meteorologists, and other scientists of Hungary, such as Jenő Cholnoky, Rezső Havass, Ernő Massány, Pál Teleki, Antal Rethly, Amade Schwalm, Rezső Milleker, and others. Although excluded from this prestigious group of prominent names in Hungarian geographical science, local representative Géza Czirbusz managed to leave his mark on the conference. The annual General Assembly of the Hungarian Geographical Society in Groß-Betschkerek was the result of the diligent work and years-long efforts of the Torontál Cultural Society to support, popularize, and expand Hungarian culture and science. At the same time, the society initiated numerous similar endeavors. The aftermath of the conference led to some lectures, as well as the scientific study of the Torontál County within the extensive publication series of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences on Hungarian cities and counties, in which the individual participants of the conference played a significant role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArheon.Same topicStonefly species taxonomy and ecologyFrench-language works237,207