MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412037119 · doi:10.1111/capa.70019

Groomers and Trigger‐Happy Thugs? Public Sector Stereotypes of Teachers and Police Officers

2025· article· en· W4412037119 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gabriela Szydlowski, Vincent Mousseau, Étienne Charbonneau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Public Administration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Intergroup Psychology
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration PubliqueMcGill University
FundersAard- en Levenswetenschappen, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPublic sectorSample (material)PsychologySchool teachersPolitical scienceSocial psychologyCriminologyPublic relationsLawPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In an era where memes and social media cross national borders, stereotypes can jump from one country to another. We tested the level of support for two public sector stereotypes from the United States in one Canadian province. A representative sample of 3,510 Quebecers answered questions about their public sector stereotypes, for teachers (n = 1,494) and police officers (n = 1,516). Although the support for the teacher as a groomer and police officers as trigger‐happy is lower and less polarized than in the original studies in the United States, the profiles of citizens who support these stereotypes are similar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Public AdministrationSame topicSocial and Intergroup PsychologyFrench-language works237,207