MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412037696 · doi:10.18280/isi.300515

Personality-Driven Innovation Adoption: Modeling ChatGPT Diffusion with BERT and Random Forest

2025· article· fr· W4412037696 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rima Benfredj, Farid Nouioua, Abderraouf Bouzıane

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalityInnovation diffusionRandom forestDiffusionPsychologyBusinessComputer scienceMarketingSocial psychologyArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In innovation adoption, individuals' decision-making process is shaped by innovation's attributes and is primarily affected by their unique personality traits, which have a bearing on their perception levels.This current study introduces a novel personality-driven innovatin adoption model that combines Rogers' diffusion theory with the OCEAN (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) personality model.Our approach accounts for the significante influence of individual differences in adoption decisions by using personalized features.Our approach accounts for the significante influence of individual differences in adoption decisions by using personalized features.We analyze ChatGPT adoption using a dataset of 38,939 tweets and user metadata after preprocessing.A BERT-Random Forest model predicts users' Big Five traits, which help refine innovation attributes such as relative advantage, uncertainty, and acceptability, ensuring the adoption process aligns with psychological factors.This proposed framework holds significant potential for forecasting individual adoption behaviors by acknowledging the relevance of individual psychological traits in the decision-making process.Furthermore, We compare our personality prediction approach with baseline models including LSTM + Random Forest, BiLSTM + Random Forest, and RoBERTa + Random Forest, and show that BERT + RF achieves the most realistic personality feature estimates.Incorporating personality-driven and recalculated perceived innovation attributes enhances the model's ability to simulate real-world adoption patterns, providing a deeper understanding of how innovations diffuse in social networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyFrench-language works237,207