Proteomic Profiling Reveals Novel Molecular Insights into Dysregulated Proteins in Established Cases of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that predominantly affects synovial joints, leading to inflammation, pain, and progressive joint damage. Despite therapeutic advancements, the molecular basis of established RA remains poorly defined. Methods: In this study, we conducted an untargeted plasma proteomic analysis using two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) in samples from RA patients and healthy controls in the discovery phase. Results: Significantly (ANOVA, p ≤ 0.05, fold change > 1.5) differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) were identified. Notably, upregulated proteins included mitochondrial dicarboxylate carrier, hemopexin, and 28S ribosomal protein S18c, while CCDC124, osteocalcin, apolipoproteins A-I and A-IV, and haptoglobin were downregulated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified CCDC124, osteocalcin, and metallothionein-2 with high diagnostic potential (AUC = 0.98). Proteins with the highest selected frequency were quantitatively verified by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis in the validation cohort. Bioinformatic analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) revealed the underlying molecular pathways and key interaction networks involved STAT1, TNF, and CD40. These central nodes were associated with immune regulation, cell-to-cell signaling, and hematological system development. Conclusions: Our combined proteomic and bioinformatic approaches underscore the involvement of dysregulated immune pathways in RA pathogenesis and highlight potential diagnostic biomarkers. The utility of these markers needs to be evaluated in further studies and in a larger cohort of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".