Predicting brain amyloid load with digital and blood-based biomarkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the recent approval of anti-β-amyloid (Aβ) treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), a demand has emerged for scalable, convenient and accurate estimations of brain Aβ burden for the detection of AD that would enable timely, accurate and reliable diagnosis in one's primary care physician's (PCPs) office as called for recently by World Health Organization (WHO). METHODS: MemTrax, a 2-minute online memory test, was selected as the digital biomarker of cognitive impairment, and blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) including Aβ42, Aβ40, P-tau181, GFAP and NfL were used to estimate AD-related metrics in different groups of elderly individuals (n = 349) for comparison with Aβ PET scans of brain Aβ burden. The correlations between MemTrax, MoCA, BBMs and brain Aβ burden, expressed in centiloid (CL) values, were analyzed for predicting CL value alone or in combinations using machine-learning (ML). RESULTS: Both MemTrax and the MoCA were able to differentiate Aβ status similarly. Integration of MemTrax and BBMs using ML, however, significantly improved the AUCs (over the same with MoCA) for differentiating Aβ status. MemTrax and p-Tau181/Aβ42 composite showed the strongest relationship with CL value among other BBMs. Most importantly, regression analyses of MemTrax and p-Tau181/Aβ42 aptly predicted CL values. CONCLUSION: The combination of MemTrax and BBMs provides an accurate, convenient, non-invasive, cost-effective and scalable way to estimate Aβ load, which provides an opportunity for mass screening and timely and accurate diagnosis of AD. Our findings could also facilitate more effective AD clinical management in the PCPs office worldwide for more equitable access to current standard of care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".