MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412042684 · doi:10.1142/s0219843625500045

Advanced Robotics in Healthcare Using Hybrid Visual Geometry Residual Networks for Enhanced Diagnostics

2025· article· en· W4412042684 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Humanoid Robotics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRoboticsResidualArtificial intelligenceComputer visionHealth careGeometryRobotAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the health sector, robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have greatly influenced the direction of patient care, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes, especially for elderly patients. With a view to ensuring real-time monitoring and quick medical response, the demand for sophisticated healthcare monitoring systems is rising with an aging population. Conventional medical monitoring methods often endure inefficiencies, including misclassifiability, vulnerability to noise, and processing slowdown, causing false diagnoses or lag in reacting to life-threatening disease. This model, a hybrid Visual Geometry Residual Network (VGRN), relies on VGG-16 strengths and the ability of ResNet-50 to counter such disadvantages and elevate classification accuracy in cases of illness. To enhance signal clarity and uniform feature representation, the system utilizes sophisticated data preprocessing tools like Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for efficient feature extraction and Gaussian filtering to suppress noise. A robotic aid system is employed to offer emergency response, medication adherence monitoring, and cognitive support, allowing real-time monitoring and immediate action. Improved patient outcomes are the result of the greater predictive analytics and disease detection of an AI-driven solution. With its remarkable accuracy of 98.52% and precision rate of 98.24%, the test result confirms the efficiency of the proposed system and far exceeds traditional approaches to health monitoring. The technology, which integrates intelligent robotic care and AI diagnostics, not only enhances the effectiveness of treatment but also reduces caregiver workloads, making elder care more convenient and efficient. By using sophisticated technology, the proposed model has an important role to play in enabling proactive management of healthcare, minimizing emergency situations, and ultimately enhancing the elderly’s quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it