MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412043390 · doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103837

Thermal analysis of a double U-loop vertical ground heat exchanger for a solar-assisted ground source heat pump

2025· article· en· W4412043390 on OpenAlexafffund
Philip Adebayo, Nicholas Fry, Roman Shor, A. A. Mohamad, Aggrey Mwesigye

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal Science and Engineering Progress · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnergi SimulationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsHeat pumpHeat exchangerEnvironmental scienceThermalThermosiphonMechanicsThermodynamicsMaterials scienceNuclear engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Comparative analysis of conventional GSHPs and a SAGSHP using a double U-loop. • A novel double U-loop GHE is proposed and compared with the conventional type. • Performance analysis conducted under dynamic conditions and a realistic building load. • The proposed double U-loop configuration shows superior performance. • No significant effect of shank spacing and borehole diameter. Among the challenges to the wider adoption of ground-source heat pumps is the ground thermal imbalance caused by significantly different heating and cooling loads in cold climate regions. To address this, this study investigates the performance of a solar-assisted ground source heat pump (SAGSHP) system for space heating and cooling in a cold climate. The system includes a 150 m deep and 0.15 m diameter ground heat exchanger (GHE) with two U-loop pipes separately connected to the solar collector and the heat pump. The effect of solar collector size and GHE parameters on the operational performance of a double U-loop SAGSHP is examined using a validated finite-volume computational fluid dynamics model. Moreover, a new double U-loop GHE configuration is proposed, and its performance is evaluated in comparison with the conventional double U-loop GHE configuration. The findings of this study indicate an up to 29% increment in the coefficient of performance of the system while maintaining a relatively constant ground temperature. For the conventional double U-loop, results further show that changes in the shank spacing for the same borehole diameter have no significant influence on the heat pump performance. However, increasing the borehole diameter results in lower peak and higher minimum temperatures of the heat pump entering fluid. The proposed inline double U-loop configuration shows superior performance over the conventional double U-loop with an additional heating COP of 0.14 and heat pump annual energy saving of 4%. This study demonstrates the potential for optimal performance improvement of SAGSHPs with the proposed inline configuration in cold climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal Science and Engineering ProgressSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207