MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412044441 · doi:10.1080/02723638.2025.2524957

Detroit’s Project Green Light: an experiment in police surveillance as economic development strategy

2025· article· en· W4412044441 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lisa Berglund

Bibliographic record

VenueUrban Geography · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsPolitical scienceEconomic growthEnvironmental planningGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Literature on territorial stigma has clearly outlined the ways that stigma as a discursive strategy has been enacted as a rationale for policy intervention to control populations viewed as disorderly or antithetical to capitalist development goals. However, these studies have been largely based on cities with growing economies, and have not adequately applied the framing of territorial stigma to understand how declining cities may operationalize stigma in new and consequential ways. This paper explores Detroit’s Project Green Light, an initiative from the Detroit Police Department that allows for small businesses to directly stream surveillance footage to the police command center at their own expense in exchange for shorter emergency response times. The case of Project Green Light exemplifies how territorial stigma is leveraged against the Black residents of a declining city to rationalize new, experimental uses of policing and privatization towards economic development goals in disinvested areas of the city. This case not only shows the ways that environments of severe decline may enact racial stigma uniquely in their economic development goals, but also illustrates how policies, born from experimentation, are important to watch due to their mobilization elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrban GeographySame topicUrban Planning and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207