Robust PINN modeling via sensitivity-based adaptive sampling: Integration of optimal sensor placement and structural uncertainty handling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as promising surrogate models for systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their practical implementation faces challenges in training efficiency and robustness to uncertainties. This study refines and improves a recently proposed sensitivity-based adaptive sampling (SBS) methodology to address these challenges specifically for twice-differentiable PDE systems. We first conduct a systematic investigation of SBS hyper-parameters, including prediction horizon and adaptation rate, revealing their crucial role in training performance. To enhance PINN model robustness facing uncertainties, we propose two approaches: (1) incorporating sensor measurements at sensitivity-identified locations into the loss function, and (2) augmenting the PINN architecture with direct sensor data inputs. Results show that our proposed approaches achieve superior generalization capabilities and robustness. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the SBS methodology can serve for optimal sensor placement by identifying locations that maximize information gain for model training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it