MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412047368 · doi:10.29173/af29550

Recension de Ethnic Minority Women’s Writing in France : Publishing Practices and Identity Formation 1998-2005. Claire Mouflard. Lexington Books, 2020. 192 p.

2025· article· fr· W4412047368 on OpenAlex
Martine Wagner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingEthnic groupIdentity (music)Media studiesSociologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesGender studiesArtAnthropologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet ouvrage, Claire Mouflard montre que l’idéal de l’intégration républicaine représenté par le slogan “Black-Black-Beur” mis en avant par les médias et les discours politiques à la suite de la victoire de l’équipe de France masculine de football en 1998, ne s’appliquait pas aux femmes « non blanches » issues de l’immigration. L'autrice poursuit la réflexion par une analyse en profondeur des ouvrages de femmes autrices issues de l'immigration de cette époque. Celles-ci revendiquent plutôt des identités intersectionnelles individuelles ou le refus d’assignation identitaire. Leur désir d’appartenance à la littérature française est redéfini au prisme du manifeste de 2007 publié dans Le Monde « Pour une littérature monde ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.011
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it