Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un passage aujourd’hui surprenant de Mythologies, Barthes écrit que les jouets plastiques n’ont pas de « vie posthume ». C’est qu’il voit la vie posthume du côté du fantôme, du spectre, de l’âme sans corps, de la fonction sans matière, plutôt que du côté du déchet, de la matière sans fonction, du corps sans âme. Comme déchet, le plastique a une vie posthume, et c’est justement l’optimisme, ou l’idéalisme, qui lui est associé qui masque sa vie posthume. Le but de cet article est de comparer, et de rapprocher, plastique et IA pour montrer que l’un et l’autre sont associés à un optimisme, un idéalisme qui nous aveugle quant à leur vie posthume. Il s’agit aussi de savoir comment la philosophie, qui vise au réel mais n’a pas de domaine empirique, peut traiter de la crise environnementale et des mutations technologiques. La réponse que nous proposons est : par la fiction et la poésie mais sans optimisme idéaliste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".