MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412063262 · doi:10.2196/76148

Enhancing Oral Health Diagnostics With Hyperspectral Imaging and Computer Vision: Clinical Dataset Study

2025· article· en· W4412063262 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Jacques Ponciano, K. Kloster, Fabia Siegberg, Bastian Plaß, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Bilal Al‐Nawas, Peer W. Kämmerer, Thomas Klauer, Daniel G. E. Thiem

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingPreprintComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicineData scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Diseases of the oral cavity, including oral squamous cell carcinoma, pose major challenges to health care worldwide due to their late diagnosis and complicated differentiation of oral tissues. The combination of endoscopic hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and deep learning (DL) models offers a promising approach to the demand for modern, noninvasive tissue diagnostics. This study presents a large-scale in vivo dataset designed to support DL-based segmentation and classification of healthy oral tissues. Objective: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive, annotated endoscopic HSI dataset of the oral cavity and to demonstrate automated, reliable differentiation of intraoral tissue structures by integrating endoscopic HSI with advanced machine learning methods. Methods: A total of 226 participants (166 women [73.5%], 60 men [26.5%], aged 24-87 years) were examined using an endoscopic HSI system, capturing spectral data in the range of 500 to 1000 nm. Oral structures in red, green, and blue and HSI scans were annotated using RectLabel Pro (by Ryo Kawamura). DeepLabv3 (Google Research) with a ResNet-50 backbone was adapted for endoscopic HSI segmentation. The model was trained for 50 epochs on 70% of the dataset, with 30% for evaluation. Performance metrics (precision, recall, and F1-score) confirmed its efficacy in distinguishing oral tissue types. Results: DeepLabv3 (ResNet-101) and U-Net (EfficientNet-B0/ResNet-50) achieved the highest overall F1-scores of 0.857 and 0.84, respectively, particularly excelling in segmenting the mucosa (0.915), retractor (0.94), tooth (0.90), and palate (0.90). Variability analysis confirmed high spectral diversity across tissue classes, supporting the dataset's complexity and authenticity for realistic clinical conditions. Conclusions: The presented dataset addresses a key gap in oral health imaging by developing and validating robust DL algorithms for endoscopic HSI data. It enables accurate classification of oral tissue and paves the way for future applications in individualized noninvasive pathological tissue analysis, early cancer detection, and intraoperative diagnostics of oral diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207