MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412065941 · doi:10.61796/icossh.v2i3.138

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING AND QUARTER LIFE CRISIS IN FRESH GRADUATE UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH SIDOARJO

2025· article· en· W4412065941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alsa Nabilah Rachma, Dwi Nastiti

Bibliographic record

VenueProceeding of International Conference on Social Science and Humanity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyQuarter (Canadian coin)History

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

being and the quarter-life crisis among fresh graduates of Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. Method: A quantitative correlational approach was employed with a sample of 279 respondents, selected using the Issac & Michael table. The Psychological Well-Being scale based on Ryff's theory and the quarter-life crisis scale based on Robbins and Wilner’s aspects were utilized as instruments. Results: The Spearman rho correlation test revealed a very strong inverse correlation between psychological well-being and the quarter-life crisis (r = -0.884; p < 0.001), indicating that higher mental well-being is associated with a reduced likelihood of experiencing a quarter-life crisis. Additionally, determination analysis showed that psychological well-being accounts for 78.1% of the variance in the occurrence of a quarter-life crisis. Novelty: This research contributes to understanding the significant role of psychological well-being in mitigating the challenges faced during the transition from graduation to the workforce, emphasizing the importance of mental health support during university years to prepare graduates for post-graduation challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceeding of International Conference on Social Science and HumanitySame topicPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207