Pengaruh Media Tanam terhadap Proses Aklimatisasi Planlet Aglaonema anyamanee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh berbagai jenis media tanam terhadap proses aklimatisasi planlet aglonema (Aglaonema anyamanee). Aklimatisasi merupakan tahap penting dalam mikropropagasi untuk menyesuaikan planlet dengan kondisi lingkungan luar. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan Rancangan Acak Kelompok (RAK) dengan empat perlakuan media tanam, yaitu tanah (kontrol), tanah+cocopeat (1:1), tanah+arang sekam (1:1), dan tanah+kompos (1:1), dengan tiga ulangan. Parameter yang diamati meliputi tinggi batang, jumlah daun, dan persentase hidup pada umur 41 sampai 69 HST. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa media tanam memberikan pengaruh nyata terhadap seluruh parameter pertumbuhan. Perlakuan T3 (tanah+kompos) menghasilkan pertumbuhan tertinggi pada tinggi batang (7.40 cm), lebar daun (5.23 cm), dan panjang daun (5.97 cm). perlakuan T0 dan T1 menunjukkan jumlah daun tertinggi (7.33 helai). Semua perlakuan menunjukkan persentase hidup sebesar 100%, menandakan bahwa seluruh media tanam mendukung kelangsungan hidup planlet. Media tanam berbasis kompos berdasarkan penelitian ini direkomendasikan sebagai pilihan terbaik untuk aklimatisasi Aglaonema anyamanee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".