Impacts of Climate Change on Oceans and Ocean-Based Solutions: A Comprehensive Review from the Deep Learning Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change poses significant threats to oceans, leading to ocean acidification, sea level rise, and sea ice loss and so on. At the same time, oceans play a crucial role in climate change mitigation and adaptation, offering solutions such as renewable energy and carbon sequestration. Moreover, the availability of diverse ocean data sources, both remote sensing observations and in situ measurements, provides unprecedented opportunities to monitor these processes. Remote sensing data, with its extensive spatial coverage and accessibility, forms the foundation for accurately capturing changes in ocean conditions and developing data-driven solutions. This review explores the dual relationship between climate change and oceans, focusing on the impacts of climate change on oceans and ocean-based strategies to combat these challenges. From the artificial intelligence perspective, this study systematically analyzes recent advances in applying deep learning techniques to understand changes in ocean physical properties and marine ecosystems, as well as to optimize ocean-based climate solutions. By evaluating existing methodologies and identifying knowledge gaps, this review highlights the pivotal role of deep learning in advancing ocean-related climate research, outlines existing current challenges, and provides insights into potential future directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".