MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The process of milk yield in highly productive cows under robotic milking conditions

2025· article· en· W4412068116 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mariia Lutsenko

Bibliographic record

VenueTehnologìâ virobnictva ì pererobki produktìv tvarinnictva · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilkingYield (engineering)Process (computing)Animal scienceMilk productionAgricultural engineeringPulp and paper industryAgricultural scienceBiologyComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scientific research was conducted at the Tere- zinе Agricultural Enterprise in the Bila Tserkva dis trict of the Kyiv region, where Ukraine’s first dairy farm with 500 cows and robotic milking systems was established. This farm has new spatial planning and technological solutions for the premises, in particular, a width of 36 m and a height of 10.5 m. In this prem ises, 8 robotic milking systems from De Laval are located in the center. Given that such a farm was cre ated for the first time in Ukraine, it was appropriate to study the process of milking cows that come to be milked of their own free will. The article highlights the results of research on the process of milk yield in high-yielding cows under conditions of robotic milk ing depending on age, lactation period, productivity of cows, and an assessment of the quality of milk ob tained under these conditions. It was established that the rate of milk ejection in cows of different lactations depends on their pro ductivity and the period of lactation activity. It in creases with the age of the animals and is the lowest in primiparous cows and the highest in cows of the IV lactation. A similar situation is observed with the average and maximum rate of milk ejection. Studies have also shown that both the average and maximum rate of milk ejection in cows depend on the daily pro ductivity of the animals. At any productivity in cows of the second, third and fourth lactations, the average rate of milk ejection increases compared to the first by 3.4 % and 11.38 %, respectively. It has been es tablished that robotic milking technology ensures the full manifestation of the milk ejection reflex, since regardless of productivity and stage of lactation, the maximum intensity of milk yield in all groups of cows is observed in the first minute of milking. It has been found that the lactation activity of animals under conditions of “motivational milking” is characterized by a slightly longer duration. The highest mass frac tion of fat in milk was found in cows in their second lactation (4.25%), and the lowest (4.12%) in cows in their fourth lactation. The ratio of fat to protein mass is within the physiological norms for animals at 1.24 1.28 to 1.0. Key words: motivational milking, milk yield, milk quality, spatial planning and technological solutions for premises, robotic milking systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTehnologìâ virobnictva ì pererobki produktìv tvarinnictvaSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207