Integrative Modeling of Urinary Metabolomics and Metal Exposure Reveals Systemic Impacts of Electronic Waste in Exposed Populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Informal electronic waste (e-waste) recycling practices release a complex mixture of pollutants, particularly heavy metals, into the environment. Chronic exposure to these contaminants has been linked to a range of health risks, but the molecular underpinnings remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the alterations in metabolic profiles due to e-waste exposure and linked these metabolites to systemic biological effects. Methods: We applied untargeted high-resolution metabolomics using dual-column LC-MS/MS and a multi-step analysis workflow combining MS1 feature detection, MS2 annotation, and chemical ontology classification, to characterize urinary metabolic alterations in 91 e-waste workers and 51 community controls associated with the Agbogbloshie site (Accra, Ghana). The impacts of heavy metal exposure in e-waste workers were assessed by establishing linear regression and four-parameter logistic (4PL) models between heavy metal levels and metabolite concentrations. Results: Significant metal-associated metabolomic changes were identified. Both linear and nonlinear models revealed distinct sets of exposure-responsive compounds, highlighting diverse biological responses. Ontology-informed annotation revealed systemic effects on lipid metabolism, oxidative stress pathways, and xenobiotic biotransformation. This study demonstrates how integrating chemical ontology and nonlinear modeling facilitates exposome interpretation in complex environments and provides a scalable template for environmental biomarker discovery. Conclusions: Integrating dose–response modeling and chemical ontology analysis enables robust interpretation of exposomics datasets when direct compound identification is limited. Our findings indicate that e-waste exposure induces systemic metabolic alterations that can underlie health risks and diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".