MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412070038 · doi:10.3390/pathogens14070663

Cathelicidins Limit Intracellular Neospora caninum-Infection in Macrophages

2025· article· en· W4412070038 on OpenAlexafffund
Franco Fiorani, Priyoshi Lahiri, Rodrigo Puentes, Peter J. Bradley, D.P. Moore, Eduardo R. Cobo

Bibliographic record

VenuePathogens · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondo para la Investigación Científica y TecnológicaCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryResults Driven Agriculture Research
KeywordsNeospora caninumBiologyMicrobiologyIntracellularIntracellular parasiteCathelicidinInflammasomeImmune systemInflammationLipopolysaccharideInnate immune systemImmunologyAntibodyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infections with the protozoan Neospora caninum cause abortion in cattle, likely due to the parasite’s replication and excessive inflammation in the placenta. Cathelicidins are host defense peptides known for their antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions, but their role in N. caninum infections remains elusive. Using bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) isolated from mice expressing (wild-type, Camp+/+) and lacking (Camp−/−) cathelicidins, we investigated the role of endogenous cathelicidin in infections with N. caninum. We show that Camp−/− macrophages primed with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) had an increased number of intracellular N. caninum tachyzoites, and these macrophages released higher amounts of IL-1β and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a marker of cytotoxicity. These findings indicate that cathelicidins contribute to intracellular N. caninum control and inflammation by limiting the activation of the inflammasome, particularly under LPS-induced conditions. This insight reveals the immunomodulatory role of cathelicidins in controlling N. caninum-associated pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePathogensSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207