Loss of 4.1B Drives PRMT3-Mediated Regulation of GBM Brain Tumour Stem Cell Growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Protein arginine methyltransferase 3 (PRMT3), a type I family PRMT, regulates the activity of downstream substrates by catalyzing the asymmetric dimethylation of arginine residues. While PRMT3 activity has been reported to be deregulated in many cancers, including glioblastoma (GBM), the underlying signalling mechanisms that contribute to disease progression are largely unknown. Methods: We tested the efficacy of a PRMT3 chemical probe, SGC707, in a cohort of GBM patient-derived primary and recurrent brain tumour stem cell (BTSC) lines. RNA-sequencing, CRISPR-cas9 knockout, and inducible overexpression methods were used to investigate the molecular mechanisms regulated by the aberrant activity of PRMT3 in different BTSC lines. Results: We show that expression of the tumour suppressor protein 4.1B, a negative regulator of PRMT3, predicts the response of GBM BTSCs to the PRMT3 chemical probe, SGC707. Furthermore, PRMT3 modulates the stability and subcellular localization of the downstream effector, UHRF1, a member of the DNA methylation complex. These findings suggest that UHRF1 and DNMT1 may suppress the expression of 4.1B through the increased promoter methylation of EPB4.1L3. Intriguingly, the inducible overexpression of EPB4.1L3 in the BT248EPB4.1L3low BTSC line mimicked the effects of the pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of PRMT3. In contrast, knockout of EPB4.1L3 in BT143EPB4.1L3high cells reduced the interactions between PRMT3 and 4.1B proteins, resulting in increased sensitivity of knockout cells to SGC707 treatment. Conclusions: These findings show that 4.1B, PRMT3, and UHRF1/DNMT1 function together to promote BTSC growth. Thus, targeting PRMT3 or UHRF1/DNMT1, especially in tumours with low endogenous 4.1B protein, may have high therapeutic relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".