MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412071623 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110463

Molecular determinants of nucleic acid recognition by an RNA-targeting ADP-ribosyltransferase toxin

2025· article· en· W4412071623 on OpenAlexafffund
Fanyang Lv, Andrea G Alexei, Jake Colautti, Nathan P. Bullen, John C. Whitney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBurroughs Wellcome Fund
KeywordsNucleic acidRNAToxinBiologyBiochemistryChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

to catalyze ADP-ribosylation reactions that regulate diverse cellular pathways in eukaryotes or function as toxins delivered by bacteria to kill competitor or host cells. Although most characterized ARTs target proteins, we recently identified RhsP2 as an antibacterial ART toxin that modifies the 2'-OH groups of structured RNAs during bacterial competition. However, the molecular basis for RhsP2's unique specificity toward RNA remains poorly understood. Here, we show that RhsP2 is a divergent member of the ART superfamily that recognizes nucleic acid substrates via a positively charged RNA-binding surface adjacent to its catalytic site. Mutations within this surface disrupt both RNA binding and ADP-ribosylation activity, abolishing RhsP2's antibacterial function. We further demonstrate that RhsP2 binds distinct small regulatory RNAs with varying affinities, suggesting that both electrostatic interactions and shape complementarity contribute to RNA target selection. Together, our findings define the molecular determinants of nucleic acid recognition by an unusual RNA-targeting ART toxin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207