Halogen-Substituted Li <sub>3</sub> InCl <sub>6</sub> : Insights into the Evolved Structure, Composition, and Ionic Conductivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ternary Li-containing halides have gained significant interest for all-solid-state batteries because they show high Li-ion conductivity and their structures can be modified. In this study, halogen substitution in Li 3 InCl 6 was attempted to form Li 3 InCl 6– x X x ( X = F, Br, I) samples whose phase compositions and Li + conductivity were characterized by X-ray diffraction and impedance spectroscopy. Based on the evolution of cell parameters, Cl can be substituted by F within the experimental limit of x ≤ 1.2, while by other halogens up to a solid solubility limit of x = 0.6 for Br and x < 0.1 for I. The Li-ion conductivity diminished with greater nominal compositions of X in the samples, especially as other phases exhibiting low conductivity are formed. These results suggest that increased polarizability of X is not a dominant factor that influences the Li + mobility in Li 3 InCl 6– x X x .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".