MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412073242 · doi:10.1103/q5sd-tpms

Joint Distribution of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic mRNA Levels in Stochastic Models of Gene Expression: Analytical Results and Parameter Inference

2025· article· en· W4412073242 on OpenAlexafffund
Juraj Szavits-Nossan, Zhixing Cao, Ramon Grima

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaScience and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology CommissionLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsInferenceStatistical physicsGene expressionJoint (building)Expression (computer science)Joint probability distributionPhysicsDistribution (mathematics)BiologyComputational biologyGeneStatisticsMathematicsComputer scienceGeneticsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common stochastic models of gene expression predict the gene-specific distribution of total mRNA per cell but lack subcellular resolution. Here, for a broad class of transcription initiation models, we derive an exact steady-state solution for the joint distribution of nuclear and cytoplasmic mRNA, and demonstrate that fitting this solution to spatially resolved mRNA data enhances parameter identifiability. By accounting for extrinsic noise, we use the model to precisely quantify bursty expression across thousands of human genes and link it to their biological functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207