Perencanaan Struktur dan Pola Ruang Kawasan Pemerintahan Tobadak berbasis Konsep Urban Resilience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central Mamuju Regency is currently aggressively carrying out sustainable regional development. The development aims at equitable distribution in the economic, social and environmental fields. As with developments in developing regions, the very rapid penetration of development always creates an urban paradox which in this case triggers a process of urbanization of the population from rural areas to cities. This planning aims to create a space capable of meeting and controlling the needs of the Tobadak Government Area both economically, socially and environmentally. The analysis techniques used include: SWOT analysis, AHP analysis, Spatial analysis and Space Syntax analysis. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained from government agencies as well as observation, documentation and interviews. The main results of this planning are the master plan, spatial structure and pattern planning as well as regional disaster mitigation based on the concept of sustainable and integrated development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it