MOKA: A pipeline for multi-omics bridged SNP-set kernel association test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The explosion of genomic and multi-omics data has created a need for scalable, reproducible tools that integrate functional annotations into genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We introduce multi-omics data bridged Kernel Association test (MOKA) pipeline, a Snakemake-based workflow that automates SNP-set kernel-based association testing by incorporating multi-omics data, including gene expression, transcription factor binding, evolutionary conservation scores and neural network-derived features. This data-bridged architecture enhances variant prioritization and aggregation, improving statistical power in GWAS. MOKA supports population structure correction via spectral decomposition, parallel computation, and post-GWAS analyses, including visualization, Gene Ontology annotation, pathway enrichment, and validation. As a use case, we applied MOKA to a schizophrenia GWAS cohort, identified 89 Bonferroni-significant genes, with a 15.7% validation rate in disease-specific DisGeNET database and enrichment in pathways relevant to neuropsychiatric disease. MOKA provides a robust, scalable, and extensible framework for functional multi-omics integration in genetic studies. It is open-source and available at https://github.com/davidenoma/moka .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".