Topographic evidence for recent intraplate reactivation in NW Uruguay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Located in eastern South America, Uruguay has been considered tectonically inactive since rifting in the Late Cretaceous. Here, we use a high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) and field observations to investigate the presence of recent tectonic activity in the Basaltic Plateau, northwest Uruguay. Based on topographic-, drainage network- and field-based data, we identify evidence for long-lasting, and potentially ongoing/recent (Cretaceous-Cenozoic) tectonic deformation, including fault breccia, scarps, and offset channels, indicative of strike-slip and normal faulting. The orientation and spatial pattern of this deformation aligns closely with inherited structures, particularly Proterozoic and Mesozoic fault zones. Our results suggest that reactivation of ancient basement structures has localized recent deformation, highlighting the importance of tectonic inheritance in controlling deformation in intraplate regions considered otherwise tectonically “inactive”. The detection of subtle, recent deformation in Uruguay is only possible because of high-resolution topographic data, underscoring the role of modern remote sensing tools in assessing tectonic activity in presumed stable regions. Lastly, this study highlights the need to reassess intraplate landscapes for signs of recent deformation, particularly in regions underlain by major basement structures that may act as zones of weakness, facilitating deformation even under minor stress conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".