MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412081414 · doi:10.18265/2447-9187a2025id8942

Bibliometric analysis of AZ31 alloy welding: trends in the use of the friction stir welding process

2025· article· en· W4412081414 on OpenAlex
Amós Freitas de Figueirêdo, Raphael Henrique Falcão de Melo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Principia - Divulgação Científica e Tecnológica do IFPB · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba
KeywordsFriction stir weldingWeldingMetallurgyAlloyProcess (computing)Materials scienceManufacturing engineeringEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of research related to lightweight alloys, particularly the AZ31 magnesium alloy, and the friction stir welding (FSW) process. A structured search using the keywords “Weld* AND AZ31*” was conducted in the Web of Science database. From the 1,681 retrieved articles, titles, keywords, and abstracts were analyzed to identify prevailing themes, commonly used terms, and emerging research trends. These trends were examined in the context of macroeconomic and socio-environmental factors, especially the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agenda and the role of lightweight alloys in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Magnesium alloys such as AZ31 are employed to produce components with up to 30% less mass than equivalent aluminum parts, contributing to lower fuel consumption and emissions in transportation. The choice of materials must consider the interaction between material, function, process, and form. In this regard, FSW, a solid-state joining process that eliminates the need for filler materials and shielding gases, is particularly effective for joining AZ31 alloys, reducing manufacturing costs and welding defects commonly associated with fusion-based methods. The analysis indicates a growing academic interest in AZ31 alloys, driven by their low density and favorable mechanical properties. However, a notable gap remains regarding multi-pass FSW and the use of machine learning techniques to predict weld behavior. Terms like “double side” or “double pass” appear in only 0.47% of the dataset. In comparison, co-occurrences of “FSW” and “Machine Learning” are limited to 0.3%, featuring techniques such as deep neural networks, decision trees, XGBoost, and random forests. The most active research groups are based in countries with high production and consumption of magnesium alloys, including China, India, Japan, the United States, and Canada. Brazil, despite being a major magnesite producer, imports metallic magnesium, highlighting the need for national policies to support technological development. This study contributes by identifying research gaps and proposing future directions in sustainable welding and manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0160.131
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it