MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412084638 · doi:10.1364/ol.564957

Compact 90° optical hybrid on a silicon-on-insulator platform with a wide bandwidth of 130 nm

2025· article· en· W4412084638 on OpenAlexaff
Gaolei Hu, Yue Qin, Hongnan Xu, Shuqi Xiao, Hon Ki Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Northwest Territories
FundersUniversity Grants Committee
KeywordsOpticsBandwidth (computing)Silicon on insulatorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsSiliconComputer scienceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Letter, we present a compact and broadband 90° optical hybrid on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. The device achieves equal power splitting through the design of a 2-by-4 star coupler, while the required quadrature 90° phase shift is introduced by tailoring the optical path lengths to the respective output ports. Experimental results show a high common mode rejection ratio exceeding 20 dB and a low phase error of less than 5° across an optical bandwidth of 130 nm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the widest bandwidth ever reported for a passive 90° hybrid on the SOI platform. With a compact footprint of 25 × 20 µm2, the proposed optical hybrid is highly suitable for applications requiring both broadband operation and dense arrays of coherent receivers, such as optical imaging and optical computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207