MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412084952 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106160

Toxic trajectories: Modeling heavy metal-laden phosphate dust dispersion and multi-receptor health risks near Kpémé’s industrial zone

2025· article· en· W4412084952 on OpenAlex
Daouda SAMA, Pamane KPIAGOU, Lipoublida Djagre, Agbessi Gerard GNAGAMAGO, Laounwi LAKMON, Aboudoulatif Diallo, Kissao Gnandi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersion (optics)Environmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceHeavy metalsMetalPhosphateIndustrial zoneEnvironmental engineeringChemistryMetallurgyMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsWater resource managementBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industrial emissions in developing regions pose catastrophic yet unquantified health-ecological threats, exemplified by Togo’s Kpémé phosphate plant. Current approaches fail to resolve atmospheric dispersion dynamics of toxic metal-laden TSP (e.g., Cd, Hg) or contextualize exposure risks for vulnerable receptors, leaving critical data gaps in meteorology and region-specific standards. We pioneer an integrated framework to establish receptor-resolved health risks by unveiling dispersion pathways and proposing Africa’s first harmonized air standards. Our novel methodology overcomes data poverty via synthetic meteorology validation and adapts regulations to local climatology. AERMOD View dispersion modeling leveraged MERRA-2/ERA5 meteorological data (2018–2022), validated by a Performance Score (PS=0.81), and 100 receptor sites. We introduced Togo-specific coefficients (e.g., K Togo =1.2) to adapt Québec air standards and developed new risk indices quantifying exposure, neurotoxic hazard quotients (HQ), and metal-specific carcinogenic risks (CR). Results demonstrate extreme TSP exceedances: 31.97 times daily standards (120 µg/m³) under normal conditions and 122.84 times during extreme events. Schools emerged as critical hotspots, with Keta Abate Kopé reaching 287 µg/m³ annually. Health impacts proved catastrophic: children’s HQ for neurotoxic metals (Pb and Hg) hit 356 times thresholds, while CR for Cr(VI) reached 12.46—exceeding safety limits (>0.0001) by orders of magnitude. Vulnerability analysis revealed clinics/schools endured triple the exposure of residential zones. This work establishes that contextual standardization and receptor-specific risk mapping are non-negotiable for Global South pollution governance. Fusing dispersion modeling with adaptive standards redefines industrial accountability, demanding urgent stack filtration and child safety buffers for climate-resilient policies in aerosol-exposed zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it