MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412088025 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf189

Interactions between bone density and muscle mass in predicting all-cause mortality: a 10-year prospective cohort study of 1388 older men (aged 77–101 years)

2025· article· en· W4412088025 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Kirk, Stéphanie Harrison, Jesse Zanker, Andrew J. Burghardt, Eric Orwoll, Peggy M. Cawthon, Gustavo Duque

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineProspective cohort studyBone densityProportional hazards modelCohort studyFemoral neckCohortHazard ratioInternal medicineOsteoporosisConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Low bone density and low muscle mass are both independent risk factors for mortality in older men. However, it is unknown if these tissues interact to increase mortality risk. Elucidating this information is important as bone and muscle are modifiable across the life cycle. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there is an interconnection between bone density and muscle mass on all-cause mortality in older men. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men study, an multicenter longitudinal study across six US sites. PARTICIPANTS: Exposures measured at baseline visit (2014-2016) included bone density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (hip, g/cm2); muscle mass by creatine dilution stable isotope (whole body, kg); bone strength by high-resolution computed tomography (tibia, newtons); and muscle volume by high-resolution computed tomography (calf, mm3). Covariates measured at baseline visit (2014-2016) included demographics and lifestyle factors as well as medical conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality by death certificates and International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision codes measured from 2014 to 2016 through August 2024. Data analysis was performed during December 2024. Cox hazards models were used to model the relationship between the exposures and outcomes, unadjusted and adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1388 men with a mean age of 84.2 ± 4.1 years (77-101 years, 91.6% white) were followed for 6.58 ± 2.61 years. A total of 663 (47.8%) men died. In unadjusted analyses using continuous exposures, interaction terms were significant between bone and muscle variables for all-cause mortality (P < 0.001 to 0.039). In men with low muscle mass or low muscle volume (≤50th percentile), each SD decrease in bone density increased all-cause mortality by a respective 19% (HR = 1.19 95% CI 1.07-1.34) and 29% (HR = 1.29 95% CI 1.11-1.49) in multivariable-adjusted models. Likewise, in men with low muscle mass or low muscle volume (≤50th percentile), each SD decrease in bone strength increased all-cause mortality by a respective 19% (HR = 1.19 95% CI 1.06-1.33) and 29% (HR = 1.29 95% CI 1.12-1.48) in multivariable-adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: We found consistent evidence for a combined association of bone and muscle health on all-cause mortality. Randomised controlled trials are now needed to confirm if increasing or preserving bone and muscle mass in old age reduces mortality risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207