MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412096595 · doi:10.3390/f16071118

The Phenophases of Mixed-Forest Species Are Regulated by Photo-Hydro-Thermal Conditions: An Approach Using UAV-Derived and In Situ Data

2025· article· en· W4412096595 on OpenAlexaff
Marín Pompa-García, Eduardo Daniel Vivar-Vivar, Andrea Cecilia Acosta-Hernández, Sérgio Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenueForests · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situEnvironmental scienceEcologyRemote sensingGeographyBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe drought events have raised concerns regarding their effects on the phenological cycles of forest species. This study evaluates the correspondence between in situ phenophases and those detected by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in tree species coexisting within a mixed forest, with particular attention to their relationship with climatic variables. Based on 12 consecutive monthly field observations, we compared phenological developments with UAV-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values, which were then correlated with environmental variables. The analysis revealed a convergence of inflection points and seasonal phenological shifts, likely driven by climatic factors, although distinct patterns emerged between coniferous and broadleaf species. Photoperiod (PP), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), maximum temperature (TMAX), and, to a lesser extent, precipitation (P) were the primary environmental variables influencing NDVI results, used here as a proxy for phenology. Photothermal conditions revealed seasonal asynchrony in NDVI responses between coniferous and broadleaf species, exerting a positive influence on conifers during summer, while having a negative impact on broadleaf species in spring. Validation of in situ observations with UAV-derived data demonstrated a biological correlation between canopy dynamics and NDVI values, supporting its use as a proxy for detecting phenophases at the level of individual trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForestsSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207