MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412097491 · doi:10.1017/s0012217325000058

Enjeux politiques et épistémiques de l’intégration des connaissances autochtones : effacement des connaissances et injustices structurelles

2025· article· fr· W4412097491 on OpenAlexaff
Ellena Thibaud-Latour

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogue · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Cet article examine les enjeux politiques et épistémiques de l’intégration des connaissances autochtones dans les systèmes de savoirs occidentaux, en y soulignant les résidus de l’impérialisme culturel. Adoptant une perspective épistémologique sociale et constructiviste, il nuance la vision majoritairement positive de cette intégration en la resituant dans un contexte de rapports de pouvoir historiques et structurels. Malgré ses intentions inclusives, l’intégration risque d’altérer profondément les savoirs autochtones en les soumettant aux cadres occidentaux, nécessitant ainsi une remise en question des structures qui façonnent la production et la validation des connaissances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.285
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialogueSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207