MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412097496 · doi:10.1017/s0012217325000071

Amour, ludification et normativité : les relations à <i>Occupation double</i>

2025· article· fr· W4412097496 on OpenAlexaff
Ann-Sophie Gravel

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogue · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La ludification de l’existence, c’est-à-dire l’application d’une structure ludique dans nos vies, a été critiquée par C.Thi Nguyen dans Games: Agency as Art (2020). Cette critique illustre en quoi les relations présentées dans l’émission de téléréalité Occupation double sont des exemples de ludification de l’amour. Ces relations constituent des modèles trop simplifiés de ce qui fonde, selon Hichem Naar, les raisons d’aimer quelqu’un, lesquelles combinent certaines qualités de la personne et la manière dont celles-ci se manifestent dans la relation. Ultimement, la ludification des relations dans cette émission ne permet pas de développer une forme d’amour appropriée et durable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialogueSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207