Pathogens From Salmon Aquaculture in Relation to Conservation of Wild Pacific Salmon in Canada: An Alternative Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Several articles over the last two decades have provided data, analyses and interpretations that suggest there are significant impacts of pathogens transmitted from farmed salmon on wild Pacific salmon populations in British Columbia (BC), the westernmost province of Canada. Because disease is a normal part of all animal populations, there is always a potential for pathogen transfer between animal populations that interact. However, the evidence is weak that pathogens transmitted from farmed salmon cause significant impacts on wild salmon populations. We provide additional data and alternative interpretations of the available evidence to show that (i) many studies overestimate the risk of pathogens transmitted from farmed salmon to wild Pacific salmon, (ii) these risks have not manifested as having significant impacts on wild Pacific salmon populations, and, therefore, (iii) the evidence better supports the conclusion that pathogens transmitted from farmed salmon are having no more than minimal impact on wild Pacific salmon populations. On the basis of this information, we hypothesize that removing open net pen salmon farms will have no detectable effect on wild Pacific salmon population productivity in relation to reference populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".