MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412105809 · doi:10.2337/dbi25-0003

High-Quality Weight Loss in Obesity: Importance of Skeletal Muscle

2025· review· en· W4412105809 on OpenAlexafffund
Mary‐Ellen Harper, Robert Dent, Ruth McPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSkeletal muscleWeight lossEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineMetabolic syndromeObesityBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment responses to behavioral, surgical, and pharmacological approaches in obesity are highly variable in quantity and quality. Here we refer to high-quality weight loss as a high proportion of fat to skeletal muscle mass lost. Given the role of skeletal muscle in energy expenditure, glucose homeostasis, metabolic flexibility, mobility, and strength, excessive loss of skeletal muscle during weight loss is a concern for overall health. Challenges in accurately measuring body composition, especially skeletal muscle, limit our understanding of muscle loss during obesity treatment. Recent incretin-related pharmacotherapies improve muscle metabolic health by enhancing glucose uptake and reducing muscle lipids but, like other weight loss interventions, are associated with muscle loss. Newer pharmacological interventions are being developed to minimize muscle loss, but many questions remain. This article examines the metabolic importance of skeletal muscle and its measurement clinically, as well as key genetic and metabolic factors influencing skeletal muscle and the quality of weight loss. Genetics can affect muscle composition (e.g., fiber types) and function. Together with metabolic factors, including neurohormonal responses and skeletal muscle metabolic efficiency and adaptation, there is variability in weight loss outcomes. In future research investigators should continue to focus on factors affecting skeletal muscle and on personalized strategies to optimize weight loss quality preserving the physical and metabolic functions of skeletal muscle. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: High-quality weight loss, i.e., a high proportion of fat to skeletal muscle lost during the treatment of obesity, is advantageous for metabolic and physical health. Precise and accurate determinations of skeletal muscle mass in clinical settings are often challenging. In prevention of excessive loss of skeletal muscle during weight loss, advantages include minimization of metabolic adaptation that makes it difficult to sustain weight loss, improved glucose homeostasis and metabolic flexibility, and better mobility and strength. Effective approaches to preserving skeletal muscle include sufficient dietary protein and inclusion of exercise (especially resistance exercise) during weight loss; new pharmacological approaches are under development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207