A Stochastic-Geometry-Based Analytical Framework for Integrated Localization and Communication Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the Internet of things (IoT) network, the integrated localization and communication (ILAC) is expected to provide high localization and communication performance simultaneously. However, the existing research to evaluate the performance of ILAC systems fails to reveal the fundamental performance of ILAC systems in practical IoT network topology analytically. In this paper, we develop a unified analytical ILAC framework using stochastic geometry. We then validate the theoretical results obtained from the proposed analytical framework with the simulation results via extensive Monte Carlo simulations. We further analyse the communication coverage and localization coverage probability with respect to the network density, time-frequency-power domain resource allocation, and communication throughout and localization threshold. Finally, based on the ILAC simulation results, we reveal design guidance for ILAC systems. Specifically, we observe the fundamental trade-off between localization and communication performance attributed to the time-frequency-power domain resource allocation. Network density positively affects the ILAC performance, while power control is much less effective due to the dense network topology. The major observations are that time-domain (TD) resource allocation is preferred in dense networks with low localization CRB thresholds, while frequency-domain (FD) resource allocation dominates in sparse networks with large localization CRB thresholds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".