MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412108376 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02352

The Role of Dynamic Polyhedral Rotations in the Phase Transitions of Rb<sub>3</sub>AlF<sub>6</sub> and Cs<sub>3</sub>AlF<sub>6</sub>

2025· article· en· W4412108376 on OpenAlexafffund
Graham King, Aydar Rakhmatullin, František Šimko

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersGovernment of SaskatchewanNational Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographyPhase transitionX-ray crystallographyCondensed matter physicsDiffractionOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structures and phase transitions of cryolite-related rubidium and cesium aluminum fluoride phases are investigated and related to the dynamic motions of AlF 6 octahedra. Low-temperature synchrotron powder diffraction data were collected on Rb 3 AlF 6 and Cs 3 AlF 6 to search for new polymorphs, and MAS NMR was used to study changes in dynamic motion occurring across the phase transitions. Rb 3 AlF 6 is found to undergo a subtle phase transition around 270 K and then a second, more substantial phase transition around 250 K. The low temperature polymorphs maintain essentially the same framework as the room temperature Fddd structure, but are more complex due to an ordered freezing of dynamic rotations of AlF 6 octahedra. Freezing of octahedral rotations is observed in Cs 3 AlF 6 around room temperature, but the same C 2/ m structure is maintained down to 80 K without any phase transitions. The dynamic motions and local structure in the high-temperature cubic polymorph of Cs 3 AlF 6 are also examined jointly by MAS NMR and reverse Monte Carlo modeling of X-ray pair distribution function data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207