MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412117412 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2025-0009

Electrochemical surface engineering for optimizing concrete interactions with formwork and reinforcement

2025· article· en· W4412117412 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N. Coniglio

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormworkReinforcementElectrochemistryMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceComposite materialElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concrete is a material commonly used in the construction industry. A critical functional aspect of concrete lies in managing the adhesion between curing concrete and solid materials such as formwork and reinforced bars. This paper reviews current methodologies for adhesion control, emphasizing the role of electrochemical science in engineering surface reactivity and stability to achieve adjusted adhesion properties. Main topics include the contribution of the interfacial transition zone, corrosion inhibitors addition, and surface polarization techniques, with an attention on their synergistic actions on adherence during the hydration process. In addition, major challenges are identified in bridging the gap between laboratory-scale findings and practical, field-based applications. Future directions are proposed, focusing on the integration of advanced materials, predictive modeling, and scalable technologies. The review concludes by highlighting the necessity of aligning fundamental research with industrial needs, paving the way for sustainable, efficient, and durable concrete structures that meet modern construction demands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207