Magneto‐Optical Correlations in a High Symmetry Dysprosium Complex Reveal an Almost “Ideal Non‐SMM” and Orange‐to‐Red Dy<sup>III</sup>‐Based Emitter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of investigating high‐symmetry systems in order to reveal properties that would otherwise be concealed in less symmetrical compounds is demonstrated. This is particularly true for discrete coordination complexes that tend to adopt low symmetries. The magnetic, optical, and theoretical investigation of [Dy{N(SiMe3)2}3], an amido complex that features an almost trigonal electrostatic environment around the DyIII ion, is reported here. While this specific coordination is ideally suited to the stabilization of high magnetic ground state for “prolate” YbIII‐based single‐molecule magnet (SMM), it is the opposite for oblate DyIII. Hence, [Dy{N(SiMe3)2}3] is expected to display the lowest conceivable magnetic anisotropy. This is confirmed herein by magneto‐optical and theoretical correlations. An extremely pure Kramers doublet composition is observed on a totally reversed energetic profile compared to the standard DyIII‐SMM. This results in a paramagnetic but dynamically silent compound, even when an external dc field is applied. Additionally, this unusual energetic profile induces an exceptional optical signature, with orange (300 K) to red (4 K) emission, far from the traditional white‐to‐yellow emission expected for a DyIII ion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".