MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412123218 · doi:10.2196/76850

Lipid Profile and Apolipoprotein B Serum Levels in the Vietnamese Population With Newly Diagnosed Elevated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Association With the Single-Nucleotide Variant rs676210: Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4412123218 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
An Viet Tran, Nhung Thi Hong Thai, Hen Huu Phan

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Cardio · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnameseSingle-nucleotide polymorphismCross-sectional studyApolipoprotein BPreprintLipid profileMedicinePopulationInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyGenotypeEnvironmental healthGeneCholesterolPathologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein B (APOB) rs676210 polymorphism has been associated with altered lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk in various populations; however, data from Vietnamese populations remain limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association of the APOB rs676210 variant with lipid profiles among Vietnamese individuals newly diagnosed with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 69 Vietnamese adults newly diagnosed with elevated LDL-C (≥130 mg/dL) at a tertiary hospital in Southern Vietnam. Participants were genotyped for APOB rs676210 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with allele-specific probes. Lipid profile components, including LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, and ApoB, were compared across genotype groups (AA vs GA/GG) and alleles (A vs G). Statistical analyses involved t tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex, the BMI, and diabetes. P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 69 participants, 32 (46.4%) carried the AA genotype, while 37 (53.6%) carried the GA or the GG genotype. The AA genotype was associated with significantly higher LDL-C (mean 5.19, SD 0.95, vs mean 4.37, SD 0.97, mmol/L; P<.001), non-HDL-C (mean 5.94, SD 1.08, vs mean 5.31, SD 1.22 mmol/L; P=.03), and ApoB (mean 149.5, SD 26.3, vs mean 136.9, SD 15.2, mg/dL; P=.02) and lower HDL-C (mean 1.26, SD 0.31, vs mean 1.44, SD 0.39, mmol/L; P=.03) compared to the GA/GG genotype. Allele-based analysis showed that carriers of the A allele (98/138, 71%) also had higher LDL-C (mean 4.91, SD 1.02, vs mean 4.36, SD 0.97, mmol/L; P=.004) and ApoB (mean 145.6, SD 23.2, vs mean 135.9, SD 16.0, mg/dL; P=.02) than G allele carriers (40/138, 29%). These associations remained significant after multivariate adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: APOB rs676210 polymorphism is associated with significant differences in lipid profiles among Vietnamese adults with elevated LDL-C. Specifically, the A allele and the AA genotype confer a more atherogenic profile, suggesting potential utility as a genetic marker in lipid screening and personalized cardiovascular risk management in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR CardioSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207