MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412123658 · doi:10.54147/jobp.v3i1.1310

Tinjauan Letter of Coordination Agreement pada Proses Publikasi Aeronautika di PIA Wilayah Jakarta

2025· article· id· W4412123658 on OpenAlexaff
Risma Farhani Puspitasari, Endang Sugih Arti, Elfi Amir, Kyky Rohmah

Bibliographic record

VenueAviation Business and Operations Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LOCA (Letter of Coordination Agreement) merupakan suatu kesepakatan operasional antara suatu pihak dengan pihak lainnya. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis melakukan studi terhadap kegiatan harian suatu kelompok dalam kondisi alamiah melalui observasi dan wawancara. Untuk meningkatkan kualitas data pada informasi aeronautika, maka diperlukan adanya pertemuan secara periodik antara PIA Wilayah Jakarta dengan sumber data untuk membahas dan mereview kembali mengenai masalah yang belum sesuai dengan LOCA yang telah disepakati.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAviation Business and Operations JournalSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207